Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon,  Email List  icon,  E-mail List icon Sign up for Black Talent News E-News
Search BlackTalentNews.com
    Search for in  

 Top Stories
 News
       Film
       Television
       Cable
       Home Video
       Music
       Theatre
       New Media
       Legal Briefs
       Executive Suite
       People
       Business
       Awards
       Obituaries
       Politics & Government
       Opportunities
 Industry Resources
       Events Calendar
       Opportunities
       Auditions
       Industry Links
 Movie Release Schedule
 Commentary
Top Stories RSS Feed
Black Box Office RSS Feed
Industry Events RSS Feed
Opportunities RSS Feed

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon,  Email List  icon,  E-mail List icon Sign up for Black Talent News E-News

Subscribe to the Free Newsletter, BTN E-News

News > Legal Briefs

Beyonce Wins Copyright Infringement Lawsuit
posted on Oct 2, 2006

On September 21, 2006 a United States District Court in Houston dismissed a copyright infringement case brought against Beyoncé and the co-authors of the Grammy® Award-winning, number one hit song “Baby Boy.”  Judge Nancy Atlas ruled that Beyoncé and the other defendants named in case did not infringe the copyright in plaintiff's song.

In response to the court’s decision, Beyoncé said "It’s unfortunate that lawsuits such as this one occur, but I am grateful and relieved to have this behind me and I am eager to move on."
 
Baby Boy” was written and produced by Beyoncé, Sean Paul, Scott Storch, Robert Waller and Jay-Z.

A Minneapolis singer-songwriter named Jennifer Armour asserted in a lawsuit filed in July 2005 that her former manager, Marc McKinney p/k/a Theo Forrest, submitted demo recordings of her song “Got a Little Bit of Love for You” to Mathew Knowles (President, Music World Entertainment), representatives of Beyoncé’s record label Columbia Records, a division of SONY BMG Music Entertainment, and Sean Paul's label Atlantic Recording Corporation in early March 2003.  She soon discovered in the litigation, however, that the writing and recording of “Baby Boy” was substantially complete by February 10, 2003, approximately one month before Armour alleged that her demo was submitted.

The basis of the court’s decision, however, was not the fact that “Baby Boy” was in existence before the date on which the plaintiff’s demos were allegedly submitted to various people and entities affiliated with the “Baby Boy” songwriters.  Beyoncé’s attorney filed a motion for summary judgment in which he asked the court to make a side-by-side comparison of the plaintiff’s song and “Baby Boy.”  One of the key questions in a copyright infringement case is whether two songs are “substantially similar” to one another.  The court made the requested side-by-side comparison and determined that no reasonable person could conclude that “Baby Boy” is “substantially similar” to the plaintiff’s song.  In fact, the court wrote that the two songs are “substantially dissimilar” from one another.

Defendants named in the lawsuit included Beyoncé, Jay-Z, Scott Storch, Robert Waller, SONY BMG Music Entertainment, Hitco Music Publishing, TVT Music, and Notting Dale Songs, all of whom were represented by Henry (“Hank”) J. Fasthoff, IV of Stumpf Craddock Massey Farrimond; and Sean Paul, Atlantic Recording Corporation, EMI Music Publishing, EMI April Music, VP Music Group, and Dutty Rock Music who were represented by Roland Garcia and Rachel Sims of Greenberg Traurig.




Legal Notice | Privacy Policy
Black Talent News | 8306 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 2057 | Beverly Hills, CA 90211
Tel 310.203.1336 | Fax 310-943-2326
Email: info@blacktalentnews.com